HomeSecurity CamerasCCTVFace Recognition Protection Not Strong Enough: Santow

Face Recognition Protection Not Strong Enough: Santow

Australian Human Rights Commissioner Edward Santow said face recognition protections were not strong enough and “law enforcement agencies shouldn’t be allowed to use it without proper safeguards in place”. “At the moment there are not strong and clear enough legal protections in place to prevent the misuse of facial recognition in high stakes areas like […]

sen>SEN.news
More from SEN
    All coverage
    Bookmark
    Page is Bookmarked

    RECOMMENDED

    ASSA ABLOY Aperio IL100 – design-driven wireless access reader. Register your interest.

    WEATHER

    Sydney
    light rain
    27 ° C
    27 °
    27 °
    51%
    3.4m/s
    21%
    Mon
    34 °
    Tue
    21 °
    Wed
    17 °
    Thu
    17 °
    Fri
    18 °

    Latest Articles

    RECOMMENDED

    Australian Human Rights Commissioner Edward Santow said face recognition protections were not strong enough and “law enforcement agencies shouldn’t be allowed to use it without proper safeguards in place”.

    “At the moment there are not strong and clear enough legal protections in place to prevent the misuse of facial recognition in high stakes areas like policing or law enforcement,” he told The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald last week.

    “We want to see this new form of technology developed in a way that is safe and provides economic opportunities, but we need safeguards that prevent harm to humans.”

    Research suggests facial recognition is less accurate when attempting to identify darker-skinned people and Santow said the use of the technology to identify an individual among many subjects was worrying.

    This so-called “one-to-many” application of facial recognition technology is distinct from the “one-to-one” systems used for passport control or user authentication in smartphones, which Santow said were low risk.

    “One-to-many is much more prone to error and the consequences of error can be exceptionally serious,” Sandow said. “In a law enforcement context, if you wrongly identify someone as a suspect, then you can take all kinds of action against that person that can violate their basic human rights.”

    “[Facial recognition for law enforcement] should not be permissible, unless or until there are proper legal protections in place that will prohibit and prevent misuse and harm against humans.”

    The Identity-matching Services Bill would allow the government to create facilities for the sharing of facial images between various government agencies and private organisations. The bill has been withdrawn and is being redrafted to meet community concern.

    About 61 per cent of Australians agree facial recognition could be a useful tool for public safety but many don’t want it used in public spaces.

    Recently, IBM, Amazon and Microsoft have all pulled their facial recognition services out of police hands in the US, on the basis of fears around mass surveillance and racial profiling.

    #sen.news

    AUTHOR

    SEN News
    SEN Newshttps://sen.news
    Security & Electronics Networks - Leading the Security Industry with News and Latest Events. Providing information and pre-release updates on the latest tech and bringing it all to you daily. SEN News has been in print for over 20 years and has grown strong as a worldwide resource in digital media.
    The people who specify, install and sign off security read SEN.Display, newsletter and sponsored content across Australia’s security industry.19,000+Monthly readers37,000+Page views200,000+Ad impressionsSee rates & specs →Google Analytics 4 · July 2026