Wire Size Considerations In Large Security Applications Must Take Into Account Cable Run Distance, Minimum Device Voltage, Amplification And More.
Wire Size Considerations In Large Security Applications – When working on larger installations remember that wire size is rated using the American Wire Gage (AWG) system and it’s all to do with diameter.
The diameter of the wire is important because if the wire’s too small you’ll get power loss caused by resistance and that’s going to mess up your performance. Quite simply, the larger the diameter of the wire, the greater will be its capacity to carry a given current, further and with less loss.
It’s best practice to use a wire with a larger diameter than you need – that’s much better than having one that’s too small, though there are cost issues.
In terms of their ability to carry power, 18 AWG will give adequate performance at up to 200m, 16 AWG will give adequate performance to just under 300m and 14 AWG will handle just under 350m.
You should consider the recommended AWG – it’s going to be 22 for sensors and 18 for high power devices. But these recommendations don’t mean you’re stuck using a set AWG when you’re looking to minimise resistance.
It’s worth noting that there’s no universal distance for a particular AWG. Supply voltage, current consumption, conductor material, connection resistance and the minimum voltage required by the field device are all factors that need consideration.
Peak current is important, too. A device that appears comfortable on a long cable run during normal operation may suffer excessive voltage drop when a lock operates, an illuminator switches on, a siren activates, etc.
Unsurprisingly, larger copper conductors cost more, are heavier and occupy more conduit and termination space. They can also be less convenient to tuck cleanly into small field devices and terminal blocks. Across a monster installation the additional copper cost can be substantial. That said, with a security and life safety solution sometimes the low-cost option is to suck up the more expensive cable cost and install the larger AWG. The additional cable cost will be insignificant compared with troubleshooting intermittent field problems, installing additional power supplies later or replacing undersized cabling later.
Wire Size Considerations In Large Security Applications
There are alternatives. Local power supplies can dramatically shorten high-current cable runs, while fibre can carry communications over long distances with electrical isolation and immunity to electromagnetic interference. Depending on system architecture, installing quality larger multicore or composite cables may be better than pushing smaller conductors to their limits.
Low-cost copper-clad aluminium and aluminium conductors will be tempting, but in Australia they are not an option for customer cabling. AS/CA S008, mandated by the ACMA, requires conductors to be plain or plated copper, solid or stranded, with the only exception being copper-clad steel or CCA used as the centre conductor of coaxial cable. Aluminium also has higher resistivity than copper, so even where it is permitted a larger conductor is required for equivalent electrical performance.
Obviously, wireless can remove much of the cable-distance problem and is capable in security applications, particularly where cabling is difficult or expensive. But RF is not always ideal. Reinforced concrete, metal structures, plant and electrical interference, changing building layouts and more can compromise performance, while wireless devices still require power, whether locally supplied or from batteries – the latter of which are great until they run out and require a site visit.
There’s also an important distinction between power and signalling. Increasing conductor diameter directly reduces resistance and voltage drop, but it doesn’t mean every communications protocol will operate over a proportionately greater distance. Data performance may be constrained by capacitance, impedance, cable construction, interference, topology and the electrical specification of the communications interface.
For cautious techs, the practical approach is to calculate the worst-case load and voltage drop rather than relying solely on a nominal cable distance. On a long run, moving up a conductor size may seem expensive but it can be considerably cheaper than discovering the copper in 250 metres of cable trays and pits needs upgrading.
You can find quality security cable here or read more SEN news here.
Key Considerations Of Cable Size
“Wire Size Considerations In Large Security Applications Must Take Into Account Cable Run Distance, Minimum Device Voltage, Amplification And More.”











Aluminium, CCA, and solid conductor copper cables do not comply with Australian Tech standards.
Thanks Neil, you’re right on aluminium and CCA, and we’ve updated the article accordingly. Clause 5.6.6.1 of AS/CA S008:2020 requires every metallic conductor in customer cabling to be plain or plated copper, with the only exceptions being copper-clad steel or CCA used as a coax centre conductor. The article now says so plainly in the text, the alternatives table, the calculator note and the key considerations card, rather than treating CCA as a cost trade-off.
Solid copper is a different matter. The same clause says a conductor may be either a single solid conductor or multi-stranded, so solid copper is expressly compliant. Cat 5e/6 building cable is solid copper for that reason. Stranded multicore is common in security field wiring for flexibility and termination, but the standard doesn’t require it. If you had a different standard in mind on that point, we’d be glad to hear it.
Appreciate you taking the time to flag it.
The wonderful thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from! AS/NZS 2201.1 still mandates all cables in a security system other than coax to be multi strand.
Fair hit, Neil, and you’re right. We checked AS/NZS 2201.1:2007 and it says exactly that: except for coaxial cable, conductors in an intruder alarm system shall be stranded, with minimum strand counts for Class 3 and above of 24/0.20 for single-core and figure-8, 7/0.20 for shielded multicore and 14/0.20 for unshielded. Our earlier reply only looked at S008, the cabling product standard, which permits solid or stranded copper. Within an intruder alarm installation, 2201.1 governs and stranded is mandatory. We’ve added that to the article and credited the correction. As for the number of standards to choose from, no argument there.
My copy of AS2201 states stranded cable. Has this recently been changed?
Thanks James. No, nothing has changed. AS/NZS 2201.1:2007 is still the current edition and your copy is right: except for coax, conductors shall be stranded, with the minimum strand counts for Class 3 and above. Our earlier reply to Neil only addressed AS/CA S008, the cabling product standard, which allows solid or stranded copper. Within an intruder alarm system 2201.1 applies and stranded is required. We’ve updated the article to say so. Good to have a second set of eyes from TAFE SA on it.