HomeArticlesNot all smoke alarms created equal

Not all smoke alarms created equal

IF you thought all smoke alarms were equally effective, think again. According to a recent study by researchers from the Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center (HIPRC) and the University of Washington in Seattle, photoelectric smoke alarms are much more likely to remain functioning after installation than are ionization alarms. Ionization alarms are the most […]

sen>SEN.news
More from SEN
    All coverage
    Bookmark
    Page is Bookmarked

    RECOMMENDED

    DAHUA CHINA
    SAGE 2026

    WEATHER

    Sydney
    heavy intensity rain
    15.4 ° C
    15.8 °
    14.6 °
    72%
    13.9m/s
    73%
    Tue
    16 °
    Wed
    18 °
    Thu
    17 °
    Fri
    20 °
    Sat
    25 °

    Latest Articles

    RECOMMENDED

    IF you thought all smoke alarms were equally effective,
    think again. According to a recent study by researchers from the Harborview
    Injury Prevention and Research Center (HIPRC) and the University of Washington
    in Seattle, photoelectric smoke alarms are much more likely to remain
    functioning after installation than are ionization alarms. Ionization alarms
    are the most common type found in U.S. households.

    The study, which looked at more than 750 households in
    Washington State, found that nine months after a smoke alarm was installed, 20%
    of the ionized alarms did not function, compared to just 5% of the
    photoelectric alarms. Researchers checked the same alarms six months later and
    found similar results. The most common cause of a non-functioning alarm was the
    removal or disconnection of the battery.

    Researchers found that ionization detectors were more
    prone to nuisance alarms, often caused by cooking. Nuisance alarms are the most
    cited reason by residents for removing or disconnecting an alarm battery. “Many
    fires in the house start in or around the kitchen, so we know that it is
    critical to have functioning smoke alarms on the first level, adjacent to the
    kitchen,” said Dr. Beth Mueller, the study principal investigator and
    epidemiologist at the HIPRC.

    “Clearly, photoelectric detectors performed much better
    in this part of the house.” 

    Alarms sold for home use in the U.S. are ionization,
    photoelectric, or combination designs. Photoelectric and ionization alarms
    operate differently. While both detect particles from combustion, photoelectric
    alarms use optical sensors and are more sensitive to slow, smoldering
    conditions. Ionization alarms are responsive to flames by detecting particles
    from rapid combustion.

    “The study results are significant,” said Dr. David
    Grossman, a pediatrician and study co-investigator who is now medical director
    for preventive care at Group Health in Seattle. “Though the U.S. has made great
    strides in getting these life-saving smoke alarms in people’s homes, we still
    have a long way to go to make sure that they remain operational. Photoelectric
    alarms may be a key answer to providing longer term protection.”

    AUTHOR

    SEN News
    SEN Newshttps://sen.news
    Security & Electronics Networks - Leading the Security Industry with News and Latest Events. Providing information and pre-release updates on the latest tech and bringing it all to you daily. SEN News has been in print for over 20 years and has grown strong as a worldwide resource in digital media.